Argument Before the Hon. B. H. Bristow, Solicitor-General of the U. S. Showing That the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Company Is Entitled to Continue and Extend Its Road to the Main Trunk, (the Union Pacific Railroad, ) and for and in Aid Of...Effingham H. Nichols, Union Pacific Railroad Central Branch · First published 2021Open the Tome
Argument before the Hon. B. H. Bristow, solicitor-general of the U.S. showing that the Central branch Union Pacific railroad company is entitled to continue and extend its road to the "Main Trunk,"Effingham H. Nichols · First published 1872Open the Tome
The nature and extent of the obligations of the Pacific Railroad Companies to the governmentEffingham H. Nichols, Eastern Division Union Pacific Railway, Union Pacific Railway Company · First published 1871Open the Tome
Arguement before the Hon. J.D. Cox, Secretary of the Interior, showing that the act of 1866 had not repealed the right of the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Company, under pre-existing laws to continue and extend its road to the "Main Trunk" (the Union Pacific R.R.) as one of the Branches thereofEffingham H. Nichols · First published 1870Open the Tome
A letter on the validity and constitutionality of the legal tender actEffingham H. Nichols · First published 1869Open the Tome
Argument before the Hon. J.D. Cox, secretary of the interiorEffingham H. Nichols, Jacob D. Cox, Union Pacific Railroad Company. · First published 1869Open the Tome
Before the Secretary of the Interior in the matter of the petition of the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad CoEffingham H. Nichols · First published 1869Open the Tome
Before the Secretary of the Interior in the matter of the petition of the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Co. bearing date Feb. 8, 1869Effingham H. Nichols, United States. Department of the Interior, Union Pacific Railroad Company. · First published 1869Open the Tome
