Minerals Separation North American Corporation and Minerals Separation, Limited, plaintiffs vs. Nevada Consolidated Copper Company, defendantMinerals Separation North American Corporation · First published 1920Open the Tome
Minerals Separation, Limited, Minerals Separation American Syndicate, Limited, and Minerals Separation North American Corporation, petitioners, vs. Butte & Superior Mining Company, designated as Butte & Superior Copper Company, Limited, respondent. Or certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitHenry D. Williams · First published 1919Open the Tome
Minerals Separation, Limited, Minerals Separation American Syndicate, Limited, and Minerals Separation North American Corporation, petitioners, vs. Butte and Superior Mining Company, designated as Butte and Superior Copper Company, Limited respondentMinerals Separation, Limited, Petitioner · First published 1919Open the Tome
Minerals Separation, Limited, Minerals Separation American Syndicate, Limited, and Minerals Separation North American Corporation, petitioners, against Butte & Superior Mining Company, respondentThomas F. Sheridan · First published 1918Open the Tome
Butte and Superior Mining Company, defendant-appellant, vs. Minerals Separation, Limited, et al., plaintiff-appelleesThomas F. Sheridan, Butte and Superior Mining Company, Minerals Separation, Limited, United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) · First published 1906Open the Tome
Minerals Separation, Limited, et al., plaintiff, vs. Butte & Superior Mining Company, defendantThomas F. SheridanOpen the Tome
Minerals Separation, Ltd., et al., appellees, vs. Butte & Superior Mining Company, appellant. Plaintiff's limitations regarding the agitation froth patent 835,120. Thomas F. Sheridan [and others] counsel for appellantMinerals Separation, Limited, AppelleeOpen the Tome
