West Shore Railroad Company to the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company. Lease. Dated December 5th, 1885West Shore Railroad Company · First published 2018Open the Tome
Decision of arbitrators governing rates of pay and certain conditions of employment of passenger and freight conductors, assistant conductors, train baggagemen, passenger trainmen, freight brakemen and flagmen, yard conductors and yard brakemen, and also conductors and trainmen in mixed train, mile run, and pusher or helper service, in the employ of the New York central & Hudson River railroad company (including the West shore railroad) and the Boston & Albany railroad companyBoard of Arbitration in the Controversy between the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company and the Order of Railway Conductors and the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. · First published 1910Open the Tome
Milwaukee, West Shore and Western Railroad CompanyUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs · First published 1888Open the Tome
Daniel B. Hatch, suing in his own behalf, and in that of all other stockholders and bondholders of the Syracuse, Chenango and New York Railroad Company against James J. Belden, individually and as receiver of the Syracuse, Chenango and New York Railroad Company, the Syracuse, Chenango and New York Railroad Company and the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company and Earl V. Alvord, complaintDaniel B. Hatch, James Jerome Belden, New York (State). Supreme Court. · First published 1885Open the Tome
West shore railroad company to the New York central and Hudson river railroad companyWest Shore Railroad Company. · First published 1885Open the Tome
Alfred A. Howlett, respondent, against the New York West Shore & Buffalo Railway Company and James J. Belden, as receiver of the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, impleaded with others, appellantsAlfred A. Howlett, James J. Belden, New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, New York (State). Supreme Court. · First published 1882Open the Tome
Alfred A. Howlett, respondent, against the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, James J. Belden, as receiver of the Syracuse, Chenango and New York Railroad Company, and the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, appellantsAlfred A. Howlett, James L. Belden, New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, New York (State). Supreme Court., Chenango and New York Railroad Company Syracuse · First published 1882Open the Tome
In the matter of the application of the New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Company to acquire title to certain real estate of the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, and othersWest Shore & Buffalo Railroad New York, Chenango and New York Railroad Company Syracuse, New York (State). Supreme Court. · First published 1882Open the Tome
